|
|
Oil Absorbency of Polypropylene Pads vs.
Natural Products
|
|
Researched
by Tensie P.
2005-06
|
|
The purpose of this experiment was to compare the oil absorbency of
natural items with that of polypropylene pads, the most common consumer
product used for this purpose.
I became interested in this idea when my math teacher told our class
about the Exxon Valdez oil spill that occurred in 1989 in Prince
William Sound, Alaska. When I did more research on the Valdez, I found
that they were able to remove the oil, with talc, a powder made from
talcum. I also found that many animals were harmed from the oil so I
decided to find out if any natural sources could absorb more oil than
consumer products.
The information gained from this experiment could be useful to the
consumer’s who need to clean oil from driveways, parking lots etc. It
could also be helpful to store owners. It would be very useful to
wildlife as well!
HYPOTHESIS
My hypothesis was that polypropylene absorbent pads would absorb at
least 10% more oil than hay would.
My second hypothesis was that polypropylene pads would absorb at least
10% more oil than sheep wool would.
I based my hypothesis on a 2002 science project by Arianne Judy. In her
results it states her hypothesis, that natural products absorb equal or
more oil than consumer, should be rejected.
EXPERIMENT
DESIGN
The constants in this study were:
• Type of oil (40 weight motor oil)
• Container size and type
• The amount of natural product used
• The amount of oil “spilled” to collect
• The temperature of the oil.
• The temperature of the room.
• Size and weight of mesh bags.
The manipulated variable was the type of product used to absorb oil; in
this case it was hay, sheep wool, llama wool, and polypropylene pads.
The responding variable was the mass of oil absorbed.
Using the triple beam balance I measured the amount of oil absorbed by
taking the beginning mass of the material and subtracting that from the
ending mass (the mass of the material plus oil). This was the mass of
the oil absorbed.
MATERIALS
| QUANTITY |
ITEM
DESCRIPTION |
| 75g |
Washed Sheep Wool |
| 75g |
Hay |
| 75g |
Water/oil
Tray |
| 1 |
Water/oil
Tray |
| 5 |
Polypropylene Pads
(consumer products) |
| 1800 ml |
Tap Water |
| 36 |
Mesh Bags |
1
|
Triple Beam Balance |
| 1 quart
(.946ml) |
40 Weight Motor Oil |
PROCEDURES
1.Create Mesh Pouches
a) Cut out 36
pieces of mesh fabric that are 12x20 cm.
b) Fold them in half so they are 12x10cm.
c) Sew along the two sides that were 20 cm. but are
now folded on top of each other. This will form 36 open pockets
that are 12x10 cm.
d) Place 4.5g. of an absorbent inside the pouch using
a triple beam balance to make sure the mass is 4.5g.
• Fill 12 mesh bags with polypropylene, 12 with hay,
and 12 with fleece.
e) Sew the tops shut.
2.Begin Experiment #1-Without Water.
a) Place
500-ml. motor oil in the tray DO NOT PUT
WATER IN.
b) Place each absorbent in pouch into the tray of
oil.
c) Leave in oil for 20 minutes. Flip the pouches over
every ten minutes.
d) Remove from tray.
e) Let the pouches drip for 24 hours.
f) Place a paper plate on the scale and record
it’s weight.
g) Next, place one pouch on the plate and weigh it.
Record the mass. Next, subtract the mass of the plate from the mass of
the pouch and the plate, so you only have the weight of the pouch.
h) Subtract 4.5g from the weight of the pouch
minus the plate. The remaining weight is the mass of oil absorbed.
Record the mass of oil that was absorbed in experiment number one.
i) Repeat steps f-h with each oil soaked pouch.
3.Begin Experiment #2-Water Only
a) Repeat Experiment number two
with WATER ONLY (No oil) Use new
absorbent pouches.
4.Begin Experiment #3(with oil and water).
a) Repeat experiment number one
but float
500ml. oil in 1000ml. H2O.
RESULTS
The original purpose of this experiment was to compare the oil
absorbency of natural items with that of polypropylene pads, the most
common consumer product used for this purpose.
The results:
• For oil only sheep wool absorbed the most oil
(85g).
• For water only on average hay absorbed the most
water (85g). Polypropylene absorbed the least amount (0.375g).
• For water and oil polypropylene absorbed the most
(100.175g), followed by sheep wool (90.9g) and hay (14.3g).
See the table and graph below.
CONCLUSION
My hypothesis was that polypropylene absorbent pads would absorb at
least 10% more oil than hay would.
The results indicate that this hypothesis should be accepted because
the polypropylene pads absorbed about seven times as much as hay did,
far more than the 10% required.
My second hypothesis was that polypropylene pads would absorb at least
10% more oil than sheep fleece would.
The results are inconclusive for this hypothesis. When absorbing
oil only (no water), sheep wool absorbed more than polypropylene. When
absorbing oil floating on water, the polypropylene did absorb 10% more
than the wool did. I rejected this hypothesis but realized that more
experimentation should be done.
After thinking about the results of this experiment, I wonder if the
kind/weight of the oil would affect the amount that is absorbed. My oil
was refined, but how would crude oil affect the results?
If I were to conduct this project again I would test more types of
materials, and do many more trials with each material. I did have a
couple of strange outliers and doing more trials would help dilute the
effect of unusual weights in the final average.
On May 24, 1989 one of the biggest oil spills in the history of the U.S
occurred. A 987-foot tanker, the Exxon Valdez, piloted by Captain
Hazelwood, and 3rd mate Gregory Cousins, spilled millions of gallons of
oil into Coral Reef, Alaska. Mourners cried openly and/or wore
black armbands to show their sorrow. It caused 21 billion dollars in
damage, Many people affected lost their jobs, and money. Many animals
lost their lives as well.
HOW WE ARE AFFECTED
Oil Spills affect us in many ways. For example a large amount of the
people who worked in the fish industry lost their jobs and money when
the Valdez struck the reef of Prince William Sound. The fish died
and/or were contaminated with oil.
Oil spills can also contaminate our drinking water. Oceans cover over
70% of the earth’s surface, and although that may seem like a lot, only
3% is fresh, safe, and clean for human needs. About 75% of that quite
small amount is frozen in glaciers and polar ice caps, so really only
about 1% of the water on earth is clean and available for use as
irrigation, drinking water, and other uses.
HOW ANIMALS ARE AFFECTED
Sea otters
The Valdez spill killed 2,800 sea otters. When sea otters’ bodies are
covered with oil, the air bubbles located in their fur fills with oil.
They can no longer survive the cold, and once the oil enters the air
pockets they are no longer kept warm due to the insulating air, and die
of cold.
Sea birds
Thousands of seabirds were killed, some drowned, and some ingested oil
which caused lung damage. About 2,800 seabirds were killed.
Small organisms
Oil spills affect more animals than most people expect. Even small
organisms such as clams, oysters, seaweed, larval fish, are affected
which affects other animals as well. Only off-shore oil spills really
cause the deaths of these small sea creatures. If plankton dies because
of oil, then, fish won’t have food so they will die and then larger
animals, such as whales, dolphins and sharks will also die. Not only
does this affect the food chain, but also many people lose their jobs
due to the contamination of the animals.
Killer Whales
Killer whales are affected by oil spills as well. When whales go up for
air and there is oil in the water they ingest a bunch of oil and water
through their blowholes, so they either drown or die from ingesting the
oil. They can also die from eating a fish that has been swimming around
in the oil, and then when whales eat the fish they eat the oil along
with it. The whales then get sick and almost always die.
MAJOR OIL SPILLS AND DAMAGE
Cuyahoga River
In 1969 Cuyahoga River in Cleveland, Ohio caught fire from oil,
chemicals and trash. It burned down two bridges with five story high
flames.
“The First Oil Spill”
The first known oil spill reported in North America occurred in 1818
when two men, who were drilling for salt at the mouth of the Cumberland
River in Kentucky, drilled a hole 536 feet deep and approximately 5
inches wide. The hole started leaking oil. The oil came gushing out and
even filling the hole with sand did not stop the flow. The river caught
on fire soon after, but nobody knows exactly what happened.
Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara’s spill occurred around January 28, 1969, about 20 years
before the Valdez spill. For about 75 years offshore drilling had been
a problem but this time it had caused a spill. An oil drilling platform
spilled 3 million gallons of oil into the water of Santa Barbara. A
drill had cut a hole into the ocean’s floor where the pressure deposit
of oil and gasoline was. The platform crew shoved a 500 ft. long
drilling pipe into the hole and the underground pressure pushed up the
oil and gasoline in 5 different places, thirty men worked with various
types of mud to plug the five holes. They also used a pipeline to try
to drain the holes. The cleanup crew spread talcum over the slick
hoping that it would make oil thicken into large clumps and be easy to
remove from the ocean. Twenty miles of California’s coastline was
“fouled”. The leaking eventually stopped but not before it spilt three
million gallons of oil into the ocean.
Hurricane Katrina Damage
Surprisingly hurricane Katrina caused 595 spills across four states,
and over 9 million gallons of crude oil was spilt. It also “unleashed”
one million.
Nantucket Island, Massachusetts
On December 15, 1976 Nantucket island, an island just off of the coast
of Cape Cod poured 7.5 million gallons of heavy industrial fuel into
the ocean. The ship was called Argo Merchant a 640 ft. tanker that had
a history of going off course and getting stuck in shallow water. The
Argo’s captain was Georgios Papadopoulos. “This man had all sorts of
equipment he didn’t use,” said Coast Guard Commandant Owen W. Silver.
Papadopoulos had gone an estimated ten miles off course. Five days
later, December 20th, a storm hit the Argo and destroyed it spilling
7.5 million gallons of water into the water. Oil slicks covered over
120 miles of the island’s shore line.
Recovery Efforts
Oil spills may be cleaned up with:
• Booms: a floating beam that contains oil spills.
• Skimmers: boats that “skim” spilled oil from the
water’s surface.
• Sorbents: big sponges that are used to absorb oil.
• Chemical dispersants: a chemical that breaks down
the oil into its chemical constitutes.
• High pressure and low pressure hoses.
• Vacuum trucks: vacuum trucks vacuum oil off beaches
and/or the sea
• Polypropylene pads: absorbent pads that absorb only
oil and not water along with it.
• Talcum powder: a type of powder that is designed to
make oil clump up so it is easier to remove.
Summary
Oil spills are tragic, and they affect many people’s lives
dramatically. They take fisherman’s job by polluting the water that the
fish swim, and the fish die, then the fisherman cannot work, and lose
lots of money. The spills don’t only take the fish industry’s money it
takes the cleanup crew’s money as well. It can take up to 3 million
dollars to clean up a single oil spill. Sometimes even more.
In addition to the economic consequences, there are many environmental
consequences as well. When an oil spill occurs it is nearly impossible
to collect all the oil from atop the water, so it damages the aesthetic
value as well as the economic value. The Prince William Sound Spill
occurred and the Sound still has not recovered entirely. Many animals
die, since once an animal is caught in the spill their chance of
survival is very slim. If oil spills continue to occur many
animals can go extinct, including the killer whale.
|
Barss, Karen Clean Water
Philadelphia: 1992, Chelsea House
Publishers
“Clean Water- Report Shows Progress, Challenges in Protecting the
Gulf of Mexico” November 16th, 2005.
<http://api-ec.api.org/environ/index.cfm?bitmask=1CA3F8FB-56C8-11D5-BC6800B0D0E15BFC
>
Cozic, Charles P. “Pollution” David l. Bender Publishers: 1992, Pgs.
10,11
Judy, Arianne “Can Natural Products Pick Up Oil as Effectively as
Polypropylene?” November 9th, 2005.
http://www.selah.k12.wa.us/SOAR/SciProj2002/ArianneJ.html>
“Oil Spills”, November 16th, 2005.
<http://library.thinkquest.org/CR0215471/oil_spills.htm>
Rozens, Aleksandrs Environmental
Destruction Fitzhenry
and Whiteside Ltd 1994, Pgs. 5-21
“Spills from Hurricane Hurting the Coast” November 16,
2005.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/?feed=TopNews&article=UPI-1-20051113-20421400-bc-us-oilspills.xml
What is the story on oil spills?
http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/topic_subtopic_entry.php?RECORD_KEY%28entry_subtopic_topic%29=entry_id,subtopic_id,topic_id&entry_id(entry_subtopic_topic)=184&subtopic_id(entry_subtopic_topic)=27&topic_id(entry_subtopic_topic)=3
|
I would like to thank the
following people for helping make my project
possible:
• My mom for
providing transportation and getting my
materials.
• Mr. Newkirk for supplying the polypropylene pads
and helping me complete my project.
• Cindy Lucky for getting me sheep wool.
• Mrs. Viernes for all the help.
• My sister for letting me use her old display board.
Thank you all so much!!
Top of page
Menu of 2005-2006 Science Projects
Back to the Selah
Homepage
|