| The Effect
of Different Deicer Concentrations on the Survival Rate of Daphnia |
Researched by Taylor S.
2003-04 |
|
PURPOSE
The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of different
deicer concentrations on the survival rate of daphnia
I became interested in this idea because I am concerned about fish and
their future survival. I understand that the food chain for fish starts
with microorganisms such as daphnia. I decided to do a project involving
daphnia and their survival rate to see if deicer kills the daphnia, which
would disrupt the food chain.
The information gained from this experiment would affect highway maintenance
and homeowners who put ice melt on their sidewalks each winter.
HYPOTHESIS
My hypothesis was that the daphnia exposed to higher concentrations
of deicer would have a lower survival rate.
I based my hypothesis on an article by Kai Schuman that stated, “Daphnia
are extremely sensitive to pesticides, metals, detergents, and bleaches. ”
I believe that this will be true for deicers and that the more concentration
of deicer added, the fewer daphnia would survive.
Back to top Of Page
EXPERIMENT DESIGN
The constants in this study were:
-
Species of daphnia
-
Age of daphnia
-
Size and type of environment daphnia are tested in (Petri dishes)
-
Temperature of water surrounding daphnia
-
Observation method 10x dissecting microscope
-
Procedures of testing
-
Amount of daphnia per container
-
Type and brand of deicer daphnia were exposed to
-
Where the testing takes place
-
Amount of light daphnia are exposed to
-
Humidity of environment
-
Unit of measurement used to measure the deicer (graduated cylinder)
-
Amount of water in each dish
-
Amount of time daphnia are exposed to deicer
-
Room Temperature (around 70*F)
The manipulated variable was the concentration level of deicer that the
daphnia were exposed to.
The responding variable was the survival rate of the daphnia after being
exposed to the deicer for a period of time.
To measure the responding variable I used a 10x dissecting microscope
to count the number of living daphnia in each group after. 5, 1, 4, 12,
and 24 hours.
Back to top Of Page
MATERIALS
| QUANTITY |
ITEM DESCRIPTION |
| 120 |
Daphnia |
| 12 |
Petri Dishes |
| 1 |
25 ml. graduated cylinder |
| 1 |
200 ml. beaker |
| 12 |
500 ml. containers |
| 1 |
eye dropper |
| 1 |
triple beam balance |
| 12 grams |
Deicer |
| 3000 ml. |
well water |
| 1 |
10x dissecting microscope |
Back to top Of Page
PROCEDURES
1. Gather materials
2. Measure 6 grams of deicer
3. Mix with 500 ml. of well water
4. Label this mixture solution A
5. Let solution A sit until the deicer mixes in with the water
6. Pour 25 ml. of solution A into a Petri dish
7. Label the Petri dish, container A (12 grams/L0
8. Take 200 ml. of solution A
9. Mix with 200 ml. of well water
10. Label this solution B
11. Pour 25 ml. of solution B into another different Petri dish
12. Label this container B (6 grams/L)
13. Take 200 ml. of solution B
14. Mix with 200 ml. of well water
15. Label this solution C
16. Pour 25 ml. of solution C into a clean Petri dish
17. Label the Petri dish container C (3 grams/L)
18. Take 200 ml. of solution C
19. Mix with 200 ml. of well water
20. Label this solution D
21. Pour 25 ml. of solution D into a unused Petri dish
22. Label the Petri dish container D (1. 5 grams/L)
23. Take 200 ml. of well water
24. Mix with 200 ml. of solution D
25. Label this solution E
26. Pour 25 ml. of solution E into a new Petri dish
27. Label the Petri dish container E (0. 75 grams/L)
28. Put 25 ml. of well water into a Petri dish (0 grams/L)
29. Label this control
30. Put 10 live daphnia into all of the Petri dishes
31. Using a 10x dissecting microscope record the amount of daphnia
alive in each Petri dish after 30 minutes, 1 hour, 4hours, 12 hours, and
after 24 hours
32. After the experiment is over put bleach on all the daphnia so that
they are all dead (do not flush them down the toilet or throw them in the
sink alive).
33. Repeat steps 1-32 for trial 2
Back to top Of Page
RESULTS
The original purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect
of different deicer concentrations on the survival rate of daphnia
The results of the experiment after 24 hours on average were the Petri
dish that held 12 grams/L of deicer had 0 live daphnia, the Petri dish
that had 6 grams/L of deicer contained 0 live daphnia, the Petri dish containing
3 grams/L of deicer had1 live daphnia on average, the Petri dish containing
1. 5 grams/L of deicer had 1. 5 living daphnia on average, and the Petri
dish containing 0. 75 grams/L had 1. 5 living daphnia on average.
See my Table and Graphs.
Back to top Of Page
CONCLUSION
My hypothesis was that the daphnia exposed to higher concentrations
of deicer would have a lower survival rate.
The results indicate that this hypothesis should be accepted because
after 24 hours the Petri dish that had 0. 75 grams/L of deicer averaged
1. 5 surviving daphnia and the Petri dish that contained 12 grams/L of deicer
had 0 left after just one hour.
Because of the results of this experiment, I wonder if deicer would
affect the growth of plants. I also wonder what would happen if I
used a different poison or if the data would be any different with a different
species of microorganism.
If I were to conduct this project again I would
-
Have more daphnia in each Petri dish, 20 would be possible to track.
-
Use neonates only, not adults.
-
Do even more trials, probably 5.
-
Check the daphnia more often, at least hourly for 24 hours.
Back to top Of Page
|
RESEARCH REPORT
Introduction
Every year people put deicer or rock salt on their driveways, sidewalks,
and their roads. Every spring the snow melts off and mixes with the deicer
or rock salt to make a solution containing the deicer from the winter before.
That very solution will find its way to lakes ponds and streams. The problem
with that is deicer is like a poison and kills some of the organisms that
live in those lakes and streams. Daphnia are a source of food for many
of the smaller fish and if the daphnia die the fish would not have anything
to eat which would hurt the food chain severely.
Daphnia
Another name for daphnia is “Water Flea” they call it the water flea
because of their short jerky hopping movement through the water.
Many fish depend on daphnia to survive, this is because the small fish
eat microorganisms. Daphnia live in fresh water like ponds, lakes, and
streams. They grow up in just a few days. Using a microscope
you can count their heart beat or tell if they’ve been eating. They
only live about 40-56 days.
There is a very big difference in size depending on the species of daphnia.
Daphnia are about 1/125 to 3/4 (. 2 to 18 millimeters) of an inch.
They move in the water by rowing themselves along. They use their antennae,
which are located on the head to feel around. Daphnia have a clear
outer shell called a carapace. The carapace is clear so it is easy
to measure the heartbeat or even observe what they’ve been eating. The
carapace does not cover the head of the Daphnia. They have six pairs
of legs, which they use to take particles of food from the water.
Culturing Daphnia
A 3-L vessel containing 30 daphnia will produce about 300 young per
week. If the container is larger the daphnia will grow larger.
Containers that are about 10-100 gallons (38-380L) are the best kind of
environment for an experiment.
Good conditions for the daphnia are
•PH 7-8. 6
•Less than 30 daphnia per 3L container
•Water temperature should be about 20-25*C
•Dissolved oxygen 6mg/L or higher
•Water hardness 160-180 mg CaCO3/L
•A cycle of 16 hours of light and 8 hours of dark per day.
Salt
People started using salt on the roads in the 1930’s. In the 1960’s
salt and plowing were done together. Salt is a main deicer because
it’s most available and most cost effective safe deicer. There are
several types of salt but the main type of salt is rock salt. Rock
salt must be mined from the earth but the other kind used is solar salt,
which evaporates from seawater. About 15 million tons
of salt are used in the US yearly and 4-5 million tons in Canada.
Salt may be used on its own if there is ice or not enough snow to plow.
Almost all snowplows now use salt too. We use salt to keep snow and
ice from sticking to the pavement. Research shows that salt makes
accidents happen less often. When you put salt on ice or snow it makes
brine that has a lower freezing temperature than the surrounding ice or
snow (the normal freezing point is 32*F. The melting point is when the
vapor pressure of the solid and the liquid are alike and the pressure totals
one atmosphere). We still use salt today because it is:
-
Readily available
-
The least expensive deicer
-
Easy to store and handle
-
Easy to spread
-
Non-toxic to humans
-
Harmless to skin and clothing
-
Relatively harmless to environment when it is used and stored properly
Other Alternatives for Salt
Most other deicers that are as effective as salt are very expensive.
Some may have a very dangerous effect on the environment, or pavement.
The National Conference of State Legislators said, “Several alternatives
to deicing salts have been investigated or tried, but they tent to be too
expensive, damaging to highway structures, more toxic than deicing salts
or not as effective. The alternatives include other deicing chemicals,
pavement heating systems, mobile thermal deicing systems, and mechanical
equipment. ” We are still trying today to find something as effective,
safe, and inexpensive as salt. Regular salt is more effective and
economical, when used right and sagely. Salt is the best way to protect
the roads from ice or snow.
Deicers
Many people don’t use deicers correctly. They put the deicer down then
wait until the snow or ice melts. This isn’t the right way because it is
very expensive and uses too much deicer. The right way to do it would
be to put the deicer down just to loosen the ice then use a shovel to scrape
off the ice or wait for the snowplow to do it. If you do this it
will save deicer and makes the damage to concrete or vegetation less likely.
The two main things used to melt ice are calcium chloride and sodium chloride
(rock salt). They use special additives to stop the salt from caking.
The most frequently used addition is called sodium Ferro cyanide that is
also called Yellow Prussiate of soda (YPS). Another is called ferric ferrocyconide,
which is also called Prussian Blue. They are usually added in amounts
of 20 to 100ppm. Ice melt also has something called heat liberation,
as the deicer dissolves it gives off heat. This is called an exothermic
reaction. A pound of calcium chloride gives out 290 BTU when it’s
dissolving. There is an opposite effect for sodium chloride, for
example it actually needs 39 BTU to turn into solution. Potassium
chloride requires even more heat (170 BTU), and urea needs 106 BTU.
Highway Safety
If there is an accident due to the snow plows not putting down deicer
it is legal to sue them. The deicer makes the roads safer by melting
off the ice which means that there is much less of a chance of cars sliding
off the road or getting into wrecks.
The illustration above came from the Salt Institute’s web page, “Deicing
and
Anti-icing for Safety and Mobility” at http://www. saltinstitute. org/30.html.
It shows the safety improvements of salting icy roads. Marquette
University’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering found that
salt reduced accidents by 88. 3%. At lower temperatures rock salt
may be more effective. The tires normally would not produce enough
friction to make the rock salt a solution if the temperatures are below
15*F and 20*F there normally wouldn’t be enough heat to turn the deicer
into a solution.
Summary
Deicers can be a help and they can also be a hindrance at the same time.
They help the people driving on the roads in the winter but in turn they
cause damage to the food chain because the deicer kills the microorganism
that fish feed on.
Back to top Of Page
|
|
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Clare, John. “Daphnia: An Aquarist's Guide” http://www. caudata. org/daphnia/Cornell
University and Penn Sate University
“Culturing Daphnia, and Daphnia in Various Life Stages” Environmental
Inquiry http://ei. cornell. edu/toxicology/bioassays/daphnia
Kirchner, Henry. “Using Deicers Correctly” http://www. saltinstitute. org/kirchner-1.html
MacDonnell, Greg. “Deicers… and the degrees they’ll go to. ” Grounds
Maintenance http://grounds-mag. com/ar/grounds_maintenance_deicersand_degrees_theyll/
McGuinnes, Keith. “How Does (too much) salt affect land plants” http://www. madsci. org/posts/archives/mar97/853362106
McLaughlin, P. A. “Water Flea. ” The World Book Encyclopedia.
1999.
Salt Institute. “Highway deicing and anti-icing for safety and mobility”
http://www. saltinstitute. org/30.html
Schuman, Kai. “Background, Size, Life cycle of Daphnia, Nutritional
value, Physical Requirements, Your Culturing Tank, and Trouble Shooting. ”
Background http://www. ee. pdx. edu/~davidr/discus/articles/daphnia. html
Van Egmond, Wim. “Water-flea anatomy”http://www. microscopy-uk. org. uk/mag/indexmag.html?http://www. microscopy-uk. org. uk/mag/artmar02/fleanatomy.html
Winter, Mark. “Melting Point” Webelements http://www. webelements. com/webelements/properties/text/definitions/melting-point.html
Back to top Of Page
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank the following people for helping make my project
possible:
-
My parents for encouraging me and helping me count the daphnia during my
experiment.
-
Tyler Smith for helping me count the daphnia in each container at certain
times in my experiment.
-
Mr. Newkirk for constantly pushing me to work harder on my project, and
for providing water for my daphnia’s environment, and for getting me the
daphnia I needed for my experiment.
-
Jack Cavanaugh for helping me count daphnia during the process of my experiment
-
Mr. Francis Sweeney, director of King County Environmental Laboratories
in Seattle for donating all the daphnia used in this experiment.
Top of page
Menu of 2003-2004 Science Projects
Back to the Selah Homepage
|