The Effect of Different Deicer Concentrations on the Survival Rate of Daphnia

Researched by Taylor S.
2003-04



PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of different deicer concentrations on the survival rate of daphnia

I became interested in this idea because I am concerned about fish and their future survival. I understand that the food chain for fish starts with microorganisms such as daphnia. I decided to do a project involving daphnia and their survival rate to see if deicer kills the daphnia, which would disrupt the food chain.  

The information gained from this experiment would affect highway maintenance and homeowners who put ice melt on their sidewalks each winter.


HYPOTHESIS

My hypothesis was that the daphnia exposed to higher concentrations of deicer would have a lower survival rate.  

I based my hypothesis on an article by Kai Schuman that stated, “Daphnia are extremely sensitive to pesticides, metals, detergents, and bleaches. ” I believe that this will be true for deicers and that the more concentration of deicer added, the fewer daphnia would survive.

Back to top Of Page


EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were:

  • Species of daphnia
  • Age of daphnia
  • Size and type of environment daphnia are tested in (Petri dishes)
  • Temperature of water surrounding daphnia
  • Observation method 10x dissecting microscope
  • Procedures of testing
  • Amount of daphnia per container
  • Type and brand of deicer daphnia were exposed to
  • Where the testing takes place
  • Amount of light daphnia are exposed to
  • Humidity of environment
  • Unit of measurement used to measure the deicer (graduated cylinder)
  • Amount of water in each dish
  • Amount of time daphnia are exposed to deicer
  • Room Temperature (around 70*F)
The manipulated variable was the concentration level of deicer that the daphnia were exposed to.

The responding variable was the survival rate of the daphnia after being exposed to the deicer for a period of time.  

To measure the responding variable I used a 10x dissecting microscope to count the number of living daphnia in each group after. 5, 1, 4, 12, and 24 hours.

Back to top Of Page


MATERIALS

QUANTITY ITEM DESCRIPTION
120 Daphnia
12  Petri Dishes
1 25 ml. graduated cylinder
1 200 ml. beaker
12 500 ml. containers
1 eye dropper
1  triple beam balance
12 grams Deicer
3000 ml. well water
1 10x dissecting microscope

Back to top Of Page


PROCEDURES

1. Gather materials 
2. Measure 6 grams of deicer
3. Mix with 500 ml. of well water
4. Label this mixture solution A
5. Let solution A sit until the deicer mixes in with the water
6. Pour 25 ml. of solution A into a Petri dish
7. Label the Petri dish, container A (12 grams/L0
8. Take 200 ml. of solution A 
9. Mix with 200 ml. of well water
10. Label this solution B 
11. Pour 25 ml. of solution B into another different Petri dish
12. Label this container B (6 grams/L)
13. Take 200 ml. of solution B
14. Mix with 200 ml. of well water
15. Label this solution C
16. Pour 25 ml. of solution C into a clean Petri dish
17. Label the Petri dish container C (3 grams/L)
18. Take 200 ml. of solution C 
19. Mix with 200 ml. of well water
20. Label this solution D
21. Pour 25 ml. of solution D into a unused Petri dish
22. Label the Petri dish container D (1. 5 grams/L)
23. Take 200 ml. of well water
24. Mix with 200 ml. of solution D
25. Label this solution E
26. Pour 25 ml. of solution E into a new Petri dish
27. Label the Petri dish container E (0. 75 grams/L) 
28. Put 25 ml. of well water into a Petri dish (0 grams/L)
29. Label this control 
30. Put 10 live daphnia into all of the Petri dishes
31. Using a 10x dissecting microscope record the amount of daphnia alive in each Petri dish after 30 minutes, 1 hour, 4hours, 12 hours, and after 24 hours
32. After the experiment is over put bleach on all the daphnia so that they are all dead (do not flush them down the toilet or throw them in the sink alive).
33. Repeat steps 1-32 for trial 2

Back to top Of Page


RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of different deicer concentrations on the survival rate of daphnia

The results of the experiment after 24 hours on average were the Petri dish that held 12 grams/L of deicer had 0 live daphnia, the Petri dish that had 6 grams/L of deicer contained 0 live daphnia, the Petri dish containing 3 grams/L of deicer had1 live daphnia on average, the Petri dish containing 1. 5 grams/L of deicer had 1. 5 living daphnia on average, and the Petri dish containing 0. 75 grams/L had 1. 5 living daphnia on average.

See my Table and Graphs.

Back to top Of Page


CONCLUSION

My hypothesis was that the daphnia exposed to higher concentrations of deicer would have a lower survival rate.

The results indicate that this hypothesis should be accepted because after 24 hours the Petri dish that had 0. 75 grams/L of deicer averaged 1. 5 surviving daphnia and the Petri dish that contained 12 grams/L of deicer had 0 left after just one hour.

Because of the results of this experiment, I wonder if deicer would affect the growth of plants. I also wonder what would happen if I used a different poison or if the data would be any different with a different species of microorganism.

If I were to conduct this project again I would

  •  Have more daphnia in each Petri dish, 20 would be possible to track.
  • Use neonates only, not adults.
  • Do even more trials, probably 5.
  • Check the daphnia more often, at least hourly for 24 hours.
Back to top Of Page

RESEARCH REPORT

Introduction

Every year people put deicer or rock salt on their driveways, sidewalks, and their roads. Every spring the snow melts off and mixes with the deicer or rock salt to make a solution containing the deicer from the winter before.   That very solution will find its way to lakes ponds and streams. The problem with that is deicer is like a poison and kills some of the organisms that live in those lakes and streams. Daphnia are a source of food for many of the smaller fish and if the daphnia die the fish would not have anything to eat which would hurt the food chain severely.

Daphnia

Another name for daphnia is “Water Flea” they call it the water flea because of their short jerky hopping movement through the water.   Many fish depend on daphnia to survive, this is because the small fish eat microorganisms. Daphnia live in fresh water like ponds, lakes, and streams. They grow up in just a few days. Using a microscope you can count their heart beat or tell if they’ve been eating. They only live about 40-56 days.  

There is a very big difference in size depending on the species of daphnia. Daphnia are about 1/125 to 3/4 (. 2 to 18 millimeters) of an inch.   They move in the water by rowing themselves along. They use their antennae, which are located on the head to feel around. Daphnia have a clear outer shell called a carapace. The carapace is clear so it is easy to measure the heartbeat or even observe what they’ve been eating. The carapace does not cover the head of the Daphnia. They have six pairs of legs, which they use to take particles of food from the water.  

Culturing Daphnia

A 3-L vessel containing 30 daphnia will produce about 300 young per week. If the container is larger the daphnia will grow larger.   Containers that are about 10-100 gallons (38-380L) are the best kind of environment for an experiment.

Good conditions for the daphnia are 
•PH 7-8. 6 
•Less than 30 daphnia per 3L container 
•Water temperature should be about 20-25*C 
•Dissolved oxygen 6mg/L or higher
•Water hardness 160-180 mg CaCO3/L 
•A cycle of 16 hours of light and 8 hours of dark per day.

Salt

People started using salt on the roads in the 1930’s. In the 1960’s salt and plowing were done together. Salt is a main deicer because it’s most available and most cost effective safe deicer. There are several types of salt but the main type of salt is rock salt. Rock salt must be mined from the earth but the other kind used is solar salt, which evaporates from seawater.   About 15 million tons of salt are used in the US yearly and 4-5 million tons in Canada.   Salt may be used on its own if there is ice or not enough snow to plow.   Almost all snowplows now use salt too. We use salt to keep snow and ice from sticking to the pavement. Research shows that salt makes accidents happen less often. When you put salt on ice or snow it makes brine that has a lower freezing temperature than the surrounding ice or snow (the normal freezing point is 32*F. The melting point is when the vapor pressure of the solid and the liquid are alike and the pressure totals one atmosphere). We still use salt today because it is: 

  • Readily available 
  • The least expensive deicer
  • Easy to store and handle
  • Easy to spread 
  • Non-toxic to humans
  • Harmless to skin and clothing
  • Relatively harmless to environment when it is used and stored properly


Other Alternatives for Salt

Most other deicers that are as effective as salt are very expensive.   Some may have a very dangerous effect on the environment, or pavement.   The National Conference of State Legislators said, “Several alternatives to deicing salts have been investigated or tried, but they tent to be too expensive, damaging to highway structures, more toxic than deicing salts or not as effective. The alternatives include other deicing chemicals, pavement heating systems, mobile thermal deicing systems, and mechanical equipment. ” We are still trying today to find something as effective, safe, and inexpensive as salt. Regular salt is more effective and economical, when used right and sagely. Salt is the best way to protect the roads from ice or snow.  

Deicers

Many people don’t use deicers correctly. They put the deicer down then wait until the snow or ice melts. This isn’t the right way because it is very expensive and uses too much deicer. The right way to do it would be to put the deicer down just to loosen the ice then use a shovel to scrape off the ice or wait for the snowplow to do it. If you do this it will save deicer and makes the damage to concrete or vegetation less likely.   The two main things used to melt ice are calcium chloride and sodium chloride  (rock salt). They use special additives to stop the salt from caking.   The most frequently used addition is called sodium Ferro cyanide that is also called Yellow Prussiate of soda (YPS). Another is called ferric ferrocyconide, which is also called Prussian Blue. They are usually added in amounts of 20 to 100ppm. Ice melt also has something called heat liberation, as the deicer dissolves it gives off heat. This is called an exothermic reaction. A pound of calcium chloride gives out 290 BTU when it’s dissolving. There is an opposite effect for sodium chloride, for example it actually needs 39 BTU to turn into solution. Potassium chloride requires even more heat (170 BTU), and urea needs 106 BTU.  

Highway Safety

If there is an accident due to the snow plows not putting down deicer it is legal to sue them. The deicer makes the roads safer by melting off the ice which means that there is much less of a chance of cars sliding off the road or getting into wrecks.  
 

The illustration above came from the Salt Institute’s web page, “Deicing and 
Anti-icing for Safety and Mobility” at http://www. saltinstitute. org/30.html.   It shows the safety improvements of salting icy roads. Marquette University’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering found that salt reduced accidents by 88. 3%. At lower temperatures rock salt may be more effective. The tires normally would not produce enough friction to make the rock salt a solution if the temperatures are below 15*F and 20*F there normally wouldn’t be enough heat to turn the deicer into a solution.  

Summary

Deicers can be a help and they can also be a hindrance at the same time. They help the people driving on the roads in the winter but in turn they cause damage to the food chain because the deicer kills the microorganism that fish feed on.
 


 Back to top Of Page

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Clare, John. “Daphnia: An Aquarist's Guide” http://www. caudata. org/daphnia/Cornell University and Penn Sate University 

“Culturing Daphnia, and Daphnia in Various Life Stages” Environmental Inquiry http://ei. cornell. edu/toxicology/bioassays/daphnia

Kirchner, Henry. “Using Deicers Correctly” http://www. saltinstitute. org/kirchner-1.html

MacDonnell, Greg. “Deicers… and the degrees they’ll go to. ” Grounds Maintenance http://grounds-mag. com/ar/grounds_maintenance_deicersand_degrees_theyll/

McGuinnes, Keith. “How Does (too much) salt affect land plants” http://www. madsci. org/posts/archives/mar97/853362106

McLaughlin, P. A. “Water Flea. ” The World Book Encyclopedia.   1999.  

Salt Institute. “Highway deicing and anti-icing for safety and mobility” http://www. saltinstitute. org/30.html

Schuman, Kai. “Background, Size, Life cycle of Daphnia, Nutritional value, Physical Requirements, Your Culturing Tank, and Trouble Shooting. ” Background http://www. ee. pdx. edu/~davidr/discus/articles/daphnia. html

Van Egmond, Wim. “Water-flea anatomy”http://www. microscopy-uk. org. uk/mag/indexmag.html?http://www. microscopy-uk. org. uk/mag/artmar02/fleanatomy.html

Winter, Mark. “Melting Point” Webelements http://www. webelements. com/webelements/properties/text/definitions/melting-point.html

Back to top Of Page

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank the following people for helping make my project possible:

  • My parents for encouraging me and helping me count the daphnia during my experiment.
  • Tyler Smith for helping me count the daphnia in each container at certain times in my experiment.  
  • Mr. Newkirk for constantly pushing me to work harder on my project, and for providing water for my daphnia’s environment, and for getting me the daphnia I needed for my experiment.  
  • Jack Cavanaugh for helping me count daphnia during the process of my experiment
  • Mr. Francis Sweeney, director of King County Environmental Laboratories in Seattle for donating all the daphnia used in this experiment.

 
 


Top of page

Menu of 2003-2004 Science Projects

Back to the Selah Homepage