The purpose of this experiment was to determine which truss bridge design supports the most mass. I became interested in this idea because my father works for the Department of Transportation and although he doesn’t design bridges he often talks with people who do. He has explained the importance of good bridge design to me. The information gained from this experiment could help engineers build
better truss bridges in the future.
My hypothesis is that the bridge design with the most triangles will support the more mass and the design with the fewest triangles will hold the least mass. I base my hypothesis on information in the book, Bridges, which says
the more triangles in a bridge the stronger it will be.
The constants in this study were:
The manipulated variable was the number of triangles in each type of truss bridge construction. The responding variable was the amount of mass in grams supported by each bridge before failure. To measure the responding variable I continued to load each model bridge
with pennies until it failed and then determined the mass of the pennies.
1. Get out all needed supplies for constructing bridges. 2. Build a platform out of 2 by 4's that’s approximately 15 centimeters high for the bridges to rest on, with a span of 26 centimeters 3.All of the bridges will have the same span of 30 centimeters and a width of 7.5 centimeters and will not have a deck. 4. Build the 12 deck frames for all six bridge designs with the measurements in step 3.(Two bridges for each design.) 5. Construct two of every bridge design using balsa wood and C.A. quick
dry glue.
6. Take all the bridges to the test platform. 7. Put the bridge being tested on to the test platform. 8. Place two extra pieces of balsa wood across the center of the deck frame to support the load. 9. Loop a piece of twine around the two pieces of balsa wood so the extra string hangs down, but about 8cm from touching the floor. 10. Tie a lightweight, small bucket to the hanging end of the twine. 11. Make sure the bridge is securely on the platform and the twine tied to the bucket is tied tight. 12. Start pouring pennies into the bucket slowly. 13. When the bridge deck frame cracks or completely breaks record the mass data in experiment log. 14. Clean all the remaining bridge pieces off the testing platform. 15. Repeat steps 7-14 on all the remaining bridges. 16. Average the 3 results in each design.
The original purpose of this experiment was to determine which truss bridge holds the most mass. It attempted to compare the strength of designs based on the number of structural triangles. The results of the experiment were that the six triangle bridge, design F, on average held the most mass: 21,204 grams. The one triangle bridge, design A, on average held the least mass: 2538 grams. In general the more triangles in the design, the more mass the bridge held. The only exception to this pattern was bridge design E, with five triangle (but no center post.) See the graph below.
My hypothesis is that the bridge design with the most triangles will support the more mass and the design with the fewest triangles will hold the least mass. The results indicate that this hypothesis should be accepted because bridge design F. had the most triangles and it held the most mass. Bridge design A had the least triangles and it held the least mass. Because of the results of this experiment, I wonder if having a support post in the middle of the bridge would help other truss bridge designs hold more mass. I also wonder if bridges constructed of different materials, like metal, would show the same results. I also wonder if a bridge that is longer than 30cm but with the same height as the tested bridges would hold more, less, or the same amount of mass. If I were to conduct this project again, I would have used larger increments of mass to break the bridges. It was very difficult to use pennies because I needed to use so many.
|
||||||||||||||||||