PURPOSE
The objective of this experiment was to determine which type of structural design and building would better withstand the effects of differing levels of pressure, strain, force and magnitude resulting from an earthquake. It will also determine how well they do in differing seismic waves. I became interested in this idea while in 4th grade when I learned that the Seattle space needle was probably the safest place in Seattle during an earthquake because of its flexibility. I followed it up with much passion, interest and research on earthquakes and especially on building construction in earthquake zones. I also have family in California at the present time and the National Geological Society predicts that a tremendous earthquake will strike California in the next 30 years. I also learned that the most damage done in an earthquake is due to faulty building design and engineering. So by this experiment it will help them determine which type of building would benefit them during an earthquake. The information gained from this experiment will benefit geologists, engineers, businesses, and other groups determine what type of building structure will help prevent the most damage and be cost efficient as well as appropriate for their needs.
HYPOTHESIS I believe that the structure design that has a base isolator will withstand the most pressure until extremely high levels of strain from the earthquake. The other construction include a normal building, a building that contains a diagonal cross-bracing and with an interior center or shear core that is made out of toothpicks, and a building that is held up by stilts all will collapse at earlier levels of force. I will be using the same materials to construct them. I base my hypothesis on the fact that in "earthquake games", by Mario Salvadori and Matthys Levy, it quotes that " inertia will prevent the building from moving and the building will not feel the earthquake". Meaning that a building isolated from the ground won’t feel the earthquake inertia. I believe that this will sustain my hypothesis. Inertia is like mass and acts like mass.
EXPERIMENT DESIGN The constants in this study were:
The manipulated variable was the different structural and engineering designs being tested and the way they were built. Another manipulated variable included the different types of seismic waves being produced by the earthquake simulation and the increase of pressure until the building design crumbles or collapses. This was done so that it enabled me to see the level of pressure that it was at in order to record and determine at how much pressure made it collapse. The responding variable was distances the springs of the model earthquake simulator were stretched to produce the force necessary to destroy the model building. To measure the responding variable I used a metric ruler to determine how far I stretched the springs on the shaker table to simulate the waves.
MATERIALS
1. Buy all materials indicated and listed on the materials list. You may proceed to buy them a local hardware store where these items may be sold. To construct the shaker table you will have to find or order a scientific guide or a scientific catalog or guide. After purchased, take your plywood board and if it doesn’t meet these measurements, 1.75 inches, 4.445centimeters thick and 24 by 18.75 inches, 60.96 by 47.625 centimeters in length then prepare to cut to make it this exact size. Then find two plywood pieces each four feet long. 2. Then take your four flexible springs 4inches, 10.16 centimeters in length and attach them by nailing them to the left and right corners of the board then take the board and place it in a safe place between two desks, chairs or tables so the bottom part hangs down. 3. Once all this is placed you must then buy wooden coffee sticks used to stir coffee these can be about 4 inches, 10.16 centimeters to about .5 of an inch or 1.27 centimeters. You will also need to buy base cover rubber at about 2 feet, 30.48 centimeters long. Cove rubber can be purchased at most local hardware store and stir sticks can be purchased at almost any craft warehouse. 4. Take you’re your rubber and cut it to make four sides each 2 inches, 5.08 centimeters tall and make them 4 inches, 10.16 centimeters long and make the roof 3 by 3 inches, 7.62 by 7.62 centimeters. This will act as your base isolator. 5. Then take out the package of stir sticks their should be a thousand. 6. You will begin constructing your first building. The building design will be a simple building with no interior fortifications preventing earthquake damage. It will not include exterior fortifications such as a base isolator reverting ground damage. Take your stir sticks and place them together to make an exterior wall that is not protected by anything else but framework. To hold the building together use play dough and in small quantities. Make sure the building is 6 inches, 15.24 centimeters in height and make the base 3 inches, 7.62 centimeters in length. If the framework does not meet these measurements prepare to cut them to make them the correct size. 7. Repeat step 7 two more times and do not do anything different. 8. Then create a building that is an exact replica of the last one but with but attach the rubber base this will act as the base isolator. 9. Repeat step 9 2 more times but use the same base isolator. 10. Make the next building as the same as the last one except add stilts to it of about 7 stir sticks each to every corner. 11. Repeat step 10 two more times. 12. Then you will begin the experiment. Make sure to place the buildings in a safe place. 13. The first trial will then begin. Place the first building on the bottom of the shaker or the part that is hanging down. Place the building there carefully. 14. The first wave you will be conducting will be love waves. Love waves travel and shake buildings by a side way motion. Take a ruler and have someone hold the ruler on the side of the shaker table. If no one is available then tape the ruler so the markings are visible to a chair or table that goes directly under the shaker table and place it on either side of the hanging part. Then make sure that the ruler is visible. Then pull the table back to the one-inch mark and let go. 15. Record the results. If the building fell then record that it fell on the 1 inch line and record it in centimeters. If the building does not crumble then pull it back 1inch or 2.54 centimeters each time. Then record the measurement it collapsed at. 16. Repeat this step with one model of the building types each. Record the results. 17. The next wave replicated was Rayleigh wave. To replicate this you must do the exact same with the ruler as the last experiment but this time hold it up horizontally and tip one of the ends so the other end is higher. Then conduct it the exact same way. 18. Record the results and do the experiment with one model of each structural design. 19. The next wave produced was shear. Take the ruler and make it horizontal place it on one side and pull down with equal force on both sides down to the 1 mark or the 2.54 centimeter mark and let up do the same as the previous trials and record the results. 20. Then do the same with one model from each group this should deplete the rest of your models. Remember to record the results for each of the tests. 21. Record all the data, place and organize it onto a graph on Microsoft excel.
The original purpose of this experiment was to determine which type of building design would withstand earthquake pressures best. These buildings included a building without any earthquake defenses, a building with a base the buildings did opposed to differing types of seismic waves which included shear waves, Love waves and Rayleigh waves. The results of the experiment showed that the building that withstood the most earthquake pressure on average was the building with interior fortifications allowing it to maintain its shape and position. The building held up by stilts also performed the best out of the buildings and was as effective as the building with interior fortifications. The building that did the worst was the building with no earthquake defenses whatsoever and without anything to isolate the seismic waves. It is difficult to conclude which building design was best overall because certain buildings had varying results with different seismic waves. See the graph below.
My hypothesis was that the structure designed with a base isolator would withstand the most pressure. The results indicate that this hypothesis should be rejected. The building with the base isolator did not perform as well as the building with interior fortifications and the building held up by stilts when subjected to Rayleigh waves. It did not do as well as the building with stilts and it performed the same as the building with interior fortifications when subjected to shear waves. Because of the results of this experiment, I wonder if buildings that are in a certain spot on my model earthquake simulator would change the way the seismic wave affected it. I also wonder if a building combination, such as buildings with stilts as well as interior fortifications, would do better than buildings without a combined design. If I changed the topography (even if I placed a tank of different soils, landscapes, topography and water levels on the shaker table) would it affect the way the seismic waves were created and worked and how much pressure the building could withstand. I also wonder if I put a group of different building s together (like in a mall or condominium), would they last longer than a similar number of lone buildings. I also wonder if I made the buildings out of the same material used in true buildings would theylast longer. If I were to conduct this project again I would have added more structural
designs and buildings that would have included buildings with wings on
them, tall buildings with a ground-level lobby, and sky scrappers. I would
also use a better model earthquake simulator perhaps with a vibrating machine
that would make the shaker table more powerful. I would use a scale truer
to that of the Richter scale and use my own observations as the Mercalli
scale. I would have also done more trials.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||